Improving image guided liver ablation

Share Improving image guided liver ablation on Facebook Share Improving image guided liver ablation on Twitter Share Improving image guided liver ablation on Linkedin Email Improving image guided liver ablation link

We want to work with patients to design research investigating this minimally invasive treatment for cancer that has spread to the liver


Background

Despite advances in treatment, cancer that has spread to the liver is difficult to treat. We want to design research to find out if ablation - a ‘pinhole surgical’ technique performed by an Interventional Radiologist - can be made more effective.

What is ablation?

Microwave ablation involves an adapted needle being placed through the skin and directly into a small liver tumour to cook it from the inside. It is a ‘pinhole surgical’ technique performed by an ‘Interventional Radiologist’ (a doctor specialising in image guided procedures), in a CT scanner.

Advantages of ablation

  • Less invasive than surgery
  • Low complication rates
  • Short hospital stay (typically overnight)
  • Low cost
  • A liver sparing approach, meaning it can be repeated
  • Suitable for patients receiving chemotherapy

However, using this technique, as many as half of tumours eventually return afterwards, and we are therefore looking for ways to reduce this number by carrying out research. By comparison, surgery is associated with recurrence of around one in ten, although is possible in less than 1 in 5 cases.

How can we reduce the number of returning tumours?

1. We propose doing this by targeting tumours more accurately using a robot - a UK first.

2. We will use special software to decide whether ablation has been successful or not.

3. We hope to introduce a new technique which is not available in the UK called 'CT hepatic angiography'. This involves injection of contrast directly into the hepatic arteries which helps us look at the treatment throughout the procedure, and better decide when it is complete.

Initial results suggest these approaches are promising, but they need to be studied further before they might be recommended across the NHS.


Why is this research necessary?

The NHS needs more evidence about these new advancements before they can be used more widely.

We want to work with patients to design research investigating this minimally invasive treatment for cancer that has spread to the liver


Background

Despite advances in treatment, cancer that has spread to the liver is difficult to treat. We want to design research to find out if ablation - a ‘pinhole surgical’ technique performed by an Interventional Radiologist - can be made more effective.

What is ablation?

Microwave ablation involves an adapted needle being placed through the skin and directly into a small liver tumour to cook it from the inside. It is a ‘pinhole surgical’ technique performed by an ‘Interventional Radiologist’ (a doctor specialising in image guided procedures), in a CT scanner.

Advantages of ablation

  • Less invasive than surgery
  • Low complication rates
  • Short hospital stay (typically overnight)
  • Low cost
  • A liver sparing approach, meaning it can be repeated
  • Suitable for patients receiving chemotherapy

However, using this technique, as many as half of tumours eventually return afterwards, and we are therefore looking for ways to reduce this number by carrying out research. By comparison, surgery is associated with recurrence of around one in ten, although is possible in less than 1 in 5 cases.

How can we reduce the number of returning tumours?

1. We propose doing this by targeting tumours more accurately using a robot - a UK first.

2. We will use special software to decide whether ablation has been successful or not.

3. We hope to introduce a new technique which is not available in the UK called 'CT hepatic angiography'. This involves injection of contrast directly into the hepatic arteries which helps us look at the treatment throughout the procedure, and better decide when it is complete.

Initial results suggest these approaches are promising, but they need to be studied further before they might be recommended across the NHS.


Why is this research necessary?

The NHS needs more evidence about these new advancements before they can be used more widely.

What is on your mind? Leave a comment

If you do not have a question about image guided liver surgery, or my research there might be a comment or observation you want to share - please do so here


Please note we cannot reply to comments in the guestbook.

loader image
Didn't receive confirmation?
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.

i had liver cancer diagnosed in 2017 and resected in jan,2018 all at rm chelsea. in the chaos that goes with diagnosis i do not recall if ablation was even discussed but it was very clear that the surgeon had a clear and unambiguous preference for open surgery and i felt grateful and relieved that he made that decision.i have had clear scans ever since. had i been offered the choice back in 2018 and had i known that there was a 33% possibility of recurrence with ablation as against 10% with surgery i would have chosen surgery. please continue research so that the odds are equalized.

robert45 about 2 years ago
Page last updated: 03 Oct 2023, 09:54 AM